Funding science in a volatile country
Argentine R&D spending has been stagnant below 0.6% of GDP for fifteen years. The problem is not only the level: it is the variance, which makes planning a research career impossible.
Argentine R&D spending has been stagnant below 0.6% of GDP for fifteen years. The problem is not only the level: it is the variance, which makes planning a research career impossible.
Technological capability is neither bought nor decreed: it accumulates in organisations that outlive several governments. That is the blind spot of much innovation policy in the region, which tends to fund projects and rarely to fund institutions.
The evidence
The survey shows that the sectors where the country built real capability share an unglamorous characteristic: moderate but stable funding over more than two decades, with a predictable technical career path.
By contrast, programmes with funding peaks followed by abrupt falls produced teams that dispersed and equipment left without trained operators.
Figure 01
R&D expenditure as a share of GDP
The argument
Useful science policy looks less like a bet and more like a boring, sustained budgetary commitment, accompanied by evaluation rules the research community recognises as legitimate.
“A laboratory is destroyed in a year and rebuilt in fifteen.”
Courses of action
- 01Establish a multi-year funding floor with automatic indexation and periodic external evaluation.
- 02Include auditability and data portability requirements in all public technology procurement.
- 03Link postgraduate training programmes to the capability priorities defined by the system.
Laboratory bench with instruments.
Methodology
The study combines budget analysis, bibliometrics and interviews with researchers and programme managers. Data and processing code are published under an open licence.
This text is part of the institute's standing editorial line. Data and replication code, where applicable, are published in the Data section.
